|
Boost : |
From: Phlip (pplumlee_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-04 14:49:33
Proclaimed David Abrahams from the mountaintops:
> A previous poster has implied that this problem is proven NP-complete. That
> means that if your algorithmicist has a polynomial solution, (s)he is about
> to revolutionize computation. I guess in your shoes I would be preparing
> myself to realize I had overlooked something ;-)
I thought "NP-complete" meant "solvable in polynomial time". Pretend I meant
whatever response curve will not rock your world ;-)
Believe me I'm having a lot harder time learning all this pre-existing AI
literature than typing in what our algorithmicist comes up with.
-- Phlip phlip_cpp_at_[hidden] ============== http://phlip.webjump.com ============== -- Friends don't let friends use Closed Source software --
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk