Re: [boost] Named template parameters

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-05 08:24:56

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>

> However, on second thought, I don't think that such
> assumption is valid at all; it would be if the class was named
> 'boost::std_iterator_builder' or something alike, but
> 'iterator_traits_builder' seems to be not bad after all..

I was coming to the same conclusion...
One other name possibility to consider, though: iterator_traits_generator

> A small issue with the code - we don't need a semicolon after
> BOOST_NAMED_TEMPLATE_PARAMETER macro invocation, and CW6.1 issues the
> "illegal empty declaration" warning for it:

Where possible, I like to arrange macros so that the trailing semicolon is
required. Can that be done?

-Dave