From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-05 08:24:56
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>
> However, on second thought, I don't think that such
> assumption is valid at all; it would be if the class was named
> 'boost::std_iterator_builder' or something alike, but
> 'iterator_traits_builder' seems to be not bad after all..
I was coming to the same conclusion...
One other name possibility to consider, though: iterator_traits_generator
> A small issue with the code - we don't need a semicolon after
> BOOST_NAMED_TEMPLATE_PARAMETER macro invocation, and CW6.1 issues the
> "illegal empty declaration" warning for it:
Where possible, I like to arrange macros so that the trailing semicolon is
required. Can that be done?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk