From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-05 11:05:36
longer, though ;-/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Named template parameters
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, David Abrahams wrote:
> abraha> > However, on second thought, I don't think that such
> abraha> > assumption is valid at all; it would be if the class was named
> abraha> > 'boost::std_iterator_builder' or something alike, but
> abraha> > 'iterator_traits_builder' seems to be not bad after all..
> abraha> I was coming to the same conclusion... One other name
> abraha> possibility to consider, though: iterator_traits_generator
> iterator_traits_generator sounds good to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk