Re: [boost] Named template parameters

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-05 16:02:16

Likewise; I don't have a preference... Alexy's got a point here, and since
he's an originator of the technique, maybe we should defer to him.
-Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Named template parameters

> Jeremy Siek wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, David Abrahams wrote:
> > abraha> I was coming to the same conclusion... One other name
> > abraha> possibility to consider, though: iterator_traits_generator
> >
> > iterator_traits_generator sounds good to me.
>
> To me too, although I still favor the 'builder' over 'generator', as (for
> me) it seems to have more connections with a step-by-step process of
> building something from parts, which is IMO exactly what the class does. I
> will be happy with any of the two names you'll decide on, though :).
>
> Aleksey
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>