From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-06 11:38:15
This is part of the reason for boost's existence, FWIW.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: Non-blocking I/O
> --- In boost_at_y..., "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_c...> wrote:
> > .political_commentary on
> > From my perspective, for C++ to move forward we need to stop asking
> why we can't
> > do something on every platform and start looking at how to provide
> > things on as many platforms as possible. The JAVA folks have done
> this well and
> > JAVA is flourishing as a result. Clearly, they have learned to
> live with
> > subsets of standard libraries for devices that won't run GUI's, for
> > C++ could easily do the same...
> > .political_commentary off
> > Jeff
> I agree with you 100% and has been thinking the same thing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk