Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-15 20:54:52

on 3/15/01 8:39 PM, Mark Rodgers at mark.rodgers_at_[hidden] wrote:

> IMHO changing the names of the classes, changing their interfaces, moving one
> into a detail namespace, providing new typedefs,and adding much more
> comprehensive test coverage combine to make this quite different library than
> that submitted, and I think we should review the result to ensure that we are
> happy with the test coverage, for example.

I was wondering this myself. I'm going to post a new version soon, right
after downloading & reviewing Boost 1.21.1 and considering Beman's

There's no other libraries on-deck ("deque"?), right? Would it be OK if we
go through the process again with the new archive? If there's another
review imminent, I guess CRC-2 could go after that, since CRC-1 just went.
(Can multiple, independent reviews go on at the same time?)

Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at