Re: [boost] type_traits missing is_function?

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-18 07:01:48

>Can't you just partially specialize for <R ()>, <R (A)>, <R(A1, A2)> and
so
>on?
>
>(you probably can't in bcc32, you'll have to go through add_pointer and
then
>detect function pointers, but it's doable... on MSVC there's no hope, but
>it's not necessary anyway.)

Yep, I admit I hadn't thought of that, the problem is always "How many
parameters?"

>
>This point is important because of the way you define "primary type
>categories." A type is in one and only one primary category.

Agreed, I was just hoping no one would notice function types :->

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/