From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-20 15:06:16
At 11:58 AM 3/20/2001, Thomas Matelich wrote:
>I had previously been under the impression that Ulrich's unittest.h would
>be sufficient for boost's needs.
Me too. Hopefully Ulrich will submit it!
> If not, I believe the
>project is trying to position itself as the default unit test
Surface impression is that we would be better off with Ulrich's.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk