Re: [boost] comment on Boost.Test

From: Thomas Matelich (sosedada_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-20 11:58:25

Beman Dawes wrote:

> Interesting point.  I can see why some would prefer not to see this
> message.  And unit test tools (for which we still need a volunteer) would
> call catch_exceptions many times so shouldn't pester the user with needless
> messages.

I had previously been under the impression that Ulrich's unittest.h would be
sufficient for boost's needs.  If not,  I believe the cppunit.sourceforge.net
project is trying to position itself as the default unit test implementation
for C++.

--
Thomas O Matelich
Senior Software Designer
Zetec, Inc.
sosedada_at_[hidden]
tmatelich_at_[hidden]