Re: [boost] Coding Guidelines for integral constant expressions

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-21 14:50:06

At 07:49 AM 3/17/2001, John Maddock wrote:

 >I've finally got around to writing up all the workarounds and hacks I had
 >to use in the type traits library as a set of coding guidelines, they
 >should be useful for anyone trying to meta-program with non-type template
 >parameters, or who want to use the type-traits or static assertion
 >libraries.
 >
 >Originally, I was just going to slip these into the type-traits docs, but 
I
 >feel that the potential readership is wider than that, so the question is
 >should these be part of boost, and if so where should they go?

Other papers have gone in the "more" sub-directory, linked to from 
more/index.htm.

The question in my mind is, should we review these papers?  All of 
them?  Probably not.  Maybe have a mini-review process for papers, and put 
some kind of a "peer-reviewed by Boost" seal on them once they pass?

--Beman