From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-21 14:50:06
At 07:49 AM 3/17/2001, John Maddock wrote:
>I've finally got around to writing up all the workarounds and hacks I had
>to use in the type traits library as a set of coding guidelines, they
>should be useful for anyone trying to meta-program with non-type template
>parameters, or who want to use the type-traits or static assertion
>Originally, I was just going to slip these into the type-traits docs, but
>feel that the potential readership is wider than that, so the question is
>should these be part of boost, and if so where should they go?
Other papers have gone in the "more" sub-directory, linked to from
The question in my mind is, should we review these papers? All of
them? Probably not. Maybe have a mini-review process for papers, and put
some kind of a "peer-reviewed by Boost" seal on them once they pass?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk