Date: 2001-04-03 14:33:56
>>>>> "williamkempf" == williamkempf <williamkempf_at_[hidden]> writes:
williamkempf> No one's suggesting using Qt for Boost. Wouldn't work. What's being
williamkempf> suggested is that the Qt approach using signals/slots is much more
williamkempf> flexible and a better design for a Boost GUI to start from. A Boost
williamkempf> GUI would more than likely be a fresh product, not a "third party"
williamkempf> library ported under the Boost distribution, but such a library needs
williamkempf> to start with a design likely borrowed from another library(s). Qt
williamkempf> has a better design in many ways than wxWindows.
Actually, I did suggest using QT. Why do you say it "wouldn't work"?
I thought the licensing issues had been addressed by Troll releasing a
version covered by GPL.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk