From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-03 14:46:29
From: Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> From: "Greg Colvin" <gcolvin_at_[hidden]>
> > From: Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> > > Generative programming does not mean "stick a generative interface on
> > > If you have all the classes, a generative interface is simply not
> > It doesn't mean that, but it can do that. And when is a generative
> > interface every strictly necessary?
> When the generative interface describes, say, 800 classes. :-) Which is not
Still, not "strictly" necessary. It's a real question: what
does generative programming contribute to the thread interface
beyond reducing the number of named classes?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk