RE: [boost] Re: scoped_ptr: trivial dtor?

From: Shankar Sai (sai.shankar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-03 22:31:48

|> >
|> > That is the idiom I was talking about.
|> 
|> Then there shouldn't be a problem.  Declaring '~C' in 'C' 
|> and placing the
|> definition for 'C::~C' below the definition for 'Cimpl' 
|> causes 'Cimpl' to be
|> a complete type at the point where 
|> 'scoped_ptr<Cimpl>::~scoped_ptr' is
|> called.  'Cimpl' doesn't even need a trivial destructor.

What if ~C (and/or ~CImpl) is trivial because of scoped_ptr and I don't 
declare/define it currently? In this case, where would ~C (and 
consequently ~Cimpl) be instantiated?

Regards
Sai