Re: [boost] Re: Is there plans to make stand-alone functor traits?

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-05 07:33:02

>(Actually it has to be a little more complicated than
>iterator_traits, because function pointers are compliated.
>There's the nuisance that if you've got
>  void f1();
>  extern "C" void f2();,
>then &f1 and &f2 are different types.

If they were guarenteed to be different that would be OK, but many
compilers treat them as the same, so do you partially specialise for them
or no?  There are also things like __stdcall which mess things up no
end....

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/