From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-15 07:53:03
----- Original Message -----
> I like this, too. Thanks!
> I am not up to spec with the boost naming conventions.
> Currently I am using the directory name C++_C_headers
> for the surrogate <cxxx> header files. Would it be
> better to create
I don't think there's a standard, but I think you'd better go with the
latter. I think URLs can't contain '+' characters.
> The corresponding name for the Python script used to
> generate the headers would be
That's fine with me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk