From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-15 15:14:03
On Tuesday, May 15, 2001, at 03:33 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> | So a question is do you support that by having a whole bunch of
> | functions, or by the class template taking some kind of a parameter
> | (perhaps a traits or policy class) performing the rounding desired?
> I'm leaning toward a trait-based solution.
I'm not positive that a trait-based solution is not the way to go, but
I'm not yet convinced it is yet either. One of the uses for rounding
mode manipulation is to run a computation with it set two ways to get a
feel for the roundoff error in the result. By making rounding mode a
compile time decision one is mandating that such users will have twice
the code size (than if it is a run time parameter).
In general I'm a very big fan of moving as much computation as possible
to compile time. But part of me is questioning a compile time rounding
mode. C describes rounding mode in the context of a floating point
environment (which can be manipulated at run time). That model may be
worthy of study.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk