Boost logo

Boost :

From: John (EBo) David (ebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-24 00:15:57

williamkempf_at_[hidden] writes:

> > That's what I mean about atomic_t being a red herring. Forget
> about
> > it. There is nothing wrong with a mutex.
> No, but there is something wrong with a mutex being used at this
> granularity.
> [snip] ...
> That's simple addition, not a full range of integral operations, so
> it's not much of an example of the need for a full
> thread_safe_int_least32_t.
> [snip] ...

could people list a couple of specific examples that would be
appropriate for a full thread_safe_int_least32_t usage? That would form
a wonderful regression/unit test basis...

  EBo --

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at