Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-25 10:15:43

Hmm... I imagine how to explain this. I'm pretty sure that the STLPort
strings have debugging iterators (i.e. class types), so it seems like there
must be some other problem here. Certainly, defining __STL_DEBUG has always
been a reliable way to select STLport's debug mode... perhaps the symbol

Aha! It looks like STLPort has a new symbol prefix: _STLP_...
So if we are testing with newer STLport releases, we should be defining


----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] regex problems g++ v3

> At 08:55 AM 5/25/2001, David Abrahams wrote:
> >I just want to reiterate that this is a reason every boost developer
> should
> >test with STLport in its debug mode. We all make these mistakes!
> The reference is
> __STL_DEBUG is already defined for the Win32 regression test, yet regex
> passes.
> Is that caused by not using STLPort debug mode correctly?
> --Beman
> To unsubscribe, send email to: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at