Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-25 12:52:56


At 11:15 AM 5/25/2001, David Abrahams wrote:

>Hmm... I imagine how to explain this. I'm pretty sure that the STLPort
>strings have debugging iterators (i.e. class types), so it seems like
there
>must be some other problem here. Certainly, defining __STL_DEBUG has
always
>been a reliable way to select STLport's debug mode... perhaps the symbol
>changed?
>
>Aha! It looks like STLPort has a new symbol prefix: _STLP_...
>So if we are testing with newer STLport releases, we should be defining
>_STLP_DEBUG.

Hum... Same results:-(

I'm using 4.0. A quick grep shows the correct symbol is __STL_DEBUG. I
don't know why the debug version of string isn't being used.

Help needed from STLPort expert (like Dave:-)

--Beman


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk