From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-28 13:07:23
Should we really consider changing a filename without any evidence that it's
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vesa Karvonen" <vesa.karvonen_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Are filenames with leading numeric a problem?
> From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> > on 5/27/01 11:29 PM, Vesa Karvonen at vesa.karvonen_at_[hidden]
> >> Currently the PREPROCESSOR library (see Files section/PREPROCESSOR/)
> uses a
> >> leading numeric character for "2nd_repeat.h". I will change the header
> name if
> >> someone proposes a better name for the 2nd repetition primitive.
> > What's wrong with "second_repeat.h"?
> Do you mean that BOOST_PREPROCESSOR_2ND_REPEAT would be retained, but the
> header would simply be renamed to "second_repeat.h"?
> Well, I guess we could go with that. It's not that difficult for a human.
> Theoretically speaking, it might make some automatizations a bit more
> difficult to implement, but I don't see how this could become an issue.
> To unsubscribe, send email to: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk