Boost logo

Boost :

From: joel de guzman (isis-tech_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-08 20:45:45

----- Original Message -----
From: <Bruce.Florman_at_[hidden]>

> If "nil" and "null" are too widely defined, how about "naught"?
> Or is there too much potential for humor in having a naught_t type?
> --Bruce

Gosh, I have to take out Spirit's 'nil' I didn't realize it is
so controversial. I kinda liked nil instead of null or NULL.

-- 'none' or even 'non' seems fine --

too much typing in 'naught' :-)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at