From: joel de guzman (isis-tech_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-08 20:45:45
----- Original Message -----
> If "nil" and "null" are too widely defined, how about "naught"?
> Or is there too much potential for humor in having a naught_t type?
Gosh, I have to take out Spirit's 'nil' I didn't realize it is
so controversial. I kinda liked nil instead of null or NULL.
-- 'none' or even 'non' seems fine --
too much typing in 'naught' :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk