Re: [boost] function review

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-14 08:03:18

From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>

> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
>
> > I can't count the instances where I #include'd <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>.
:-)
>
> Me, too. But I wonder if it isn't due to the name similarity:
> shared_ptr/smart_ptr. If shared_ptr were in resource_management.hpp (not
> that I'm suggesting we do that) I think the problem wouldn't be nearly as
> bad.

No, in my case it isn't about name similarity. I don't even think about
including <smart_ptr.hpp>. :-)

OTOH I guess that if (when) shared_ptr goes into std:: it probably would end
up in <smart_ptr>, so I may well start getting used to it.

--
Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.