From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-14 11:01:45
Peter Dimov wrote:
>OTOH I guess that if (when) shared_ptr goes into std:: it probably would
>end up in <smart_ptr>, so I may well start getting used to it.
My guess is that the C++ committee is unlikely to exactly follow Boost
practice when it comes to:
* header names
* header sub-directories and their names
* sub-namespaces and their names.
Those issues haven't been discussed yet by the committee. I'll post
something on the committee's lib reflector to get them thinking about the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk