Re: [boost] function review

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-14 09:06:38

From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>

> Speaking seriously, I would _love_ to see 'boost/smart_ptr.hpp' header
> splitted into separate files, one for each of the pointer types we have,
> e.g. "boost/memory/scoped_ptr.hpp", "boost/memory/shared_ptr.hpp" etc. The
> main motivation is breaking unnecessary dependencies. For instance, here
at
> work we use 'scoped_ptr' much more often than anything else, and
recompiling
> half of the project after the recent bug fix in 'shared_ptr' wasn't a very
> pleasant experience.

I agree wholeheartedly; I thought of doing that myself. After boost::bind,
perhaps.

--
Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.