From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-24 15:37:54
I have often heard it claimed that anything you can do with template
template parameters, you can also do without them, but better. I am not
familiar with the arguments, so I can't evaluate their validity. Anyway,
maybe Hubert could investigate these techniques to see whether they offer
any improvements in addition to portability.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Special functions, octonions, quaternions in the CVS
> At 04:16 AM 6/23/2001, Jens Maurer wrote:
> >The special functions, octonions, and quaternions by Hubert Holin
> >are now added to the CVS.
> On the Win32 regression tests, they are failing all compilers except
> As Daryle Walker pointed out, it looks like this is because they use
> template-template parameters. Unless I missed it, there doesn't seem to
> a non-template-template parameter workaround provided.
> >Updates for the regression test results are in progress.
> Info: http://www.boost.org Unsubscribe:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk