Re: [boost] Win32 regression tests

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-24 15:40:09

The Intel column has lots of failures. IIRC, they've released v. 5.1 of
their compiler. Maybe we should be testing with that.

-Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [boost] Win32 regression tests

> I've just uploaded the Win32 regression test results including log file
to:
>
> ftp://boost.sourceforge.net/pub/boost/regression-logs/win32.zip
>
> Attached is a shortened version of the status table, showing only rows
with
> at least one failure.
>
> Rows with lots of failures seem high priority to me.
>
> The math/special functions failures were mentioned in an earlier posting.
>
> Four failures for iterators_test.cpp seem worrisome.  Iterators as a whole
> seem weak; 13 failures out of 6*6=36 tests.
>
> Good news for a couple of new libraries; both Function and Tokenizer
> libraries are passing their tests on all the Win32 compilers.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Beman
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>