From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-26 08:15:37
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hubert HOLIN" <Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden]>
> Hi all
> [Sorry for the late reaction, I curently have an urgent
> situation which is swamping me]
> I have introduced a math folder but not a math namespace
> because I understood that was what the final recommendations called
> for. I can of course introduce the namespace math if it is deemed
> I personaly would like to introduce that namespace, as it
> could be a starting point to tidy-up and improve upon the existing math
> support (for instance one could then have templated trig functions...).
> I do not believe a quaternion or an octonion namespace is
> called for,
> but a special_functions might, however.
No opinion. Would math:: be inappropriate for these?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk