From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-26 09:36:43
At 09:15 AM 6/26/2001, David Abrahams wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Hubert HOLIN" <Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden]>
>> Hi all
>> [Sorry for the late reaction, I curently have an urgent
>> situation which is swamping me]
>> I have introduced a math folder but not a math namespace
>> because I understood that was what the final recommendations called
>> for. I can of course introduce the namespace math if it is deemed
>> I personaly would like to introduce that namespace, as it
>> could be a starting point to tidy-up and improve upon the existing math
>> support (for instance one could then have templated trig functions...).
>> I do not believe a quaternion or an octonion namespace is
>> called for,
>> but a special_functions might, however.
>No opinion. Would math:: be inappropriate for these?
Seems like there is enough consensus to go ahead and add a namespace math,
but no sub-namespaces under boost::math.
Are Hubert and Jens are available to do that before a release?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk