RE: template template parameters (was Re: [boost] Re: Special fun ctions, octonions, quaternions in the CVS)

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-26 10:13:04

 Beman Dawes wrote:
> But in another message someone claimed that template template 
> parameter replacements were not just broken compiler 
> workarounds, but actually better that template template parameters.  
> Could someone explain the rationale behind that assertion?

One of the reasons is described here -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/8454. I've heard, however,
Dietmar saying that there is a preliminary agreement to fix this so the
second example in the cited message would work too. Don't know the details,
though.

Aleksey