From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-26 10:13:04
Beman Dawes wrote:
> But in another message someone claimed that template template
> parameter replacements were not just broken compiler
> workarounds, but actually better that template template parameters.
> Could someone explain the rationale behind that assertion?
One of the reasons is described here -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/8454. I've heard, however,
Dietmar saying that there is a preliminary agreement to fix this so the
second example in the cited message would work too. Don't know the details,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk