Re: [boost] Re: Special functions, octonions, quaternions in the CVS

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-26 12:14:42

Quick question: is the "math" namespace going to encompass the stuff we've
been talking about under the name "numeric"? E.g., matrices, etc. If so,
is "math" the right name, or should we use "numeric"? If not, perhaps
we should have a least a preliminary definition of what areas the
namespace covers.

Cheers,
Jeremy

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Beman Dawes wrote:
bdawes> Seems like there is enough consensus to go ahead and add a namespace math, 
bdawes> but no sub-namespaces under boost::math.
bdawes> 
bdawes> Are Hubert and Jens are available to do that before a release?
bdawes> 
bdawes> Thanks,
bdawes> 
bdawes> --Beman

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                        www: http://www.lsc.nd.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Candidate, IU B'ton          email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 Summer Manager, AT&T Research      phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------