From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-27 17:41:18
David Abrahams wrote:
> OK, I'm back to neutral. At least one vendor started
> enforcing it recently, prompting a massive review
> of boost code.
Well, we can always define BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT to use enum trick for that
compiler, until the formal rules become that they were intended to be before
too restrictive wording got into the standard.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk