From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-28 07:12:13
> --- In boost_at_y..., "Greg Colvin" <gcolvin_at_u...> wrote:
> > I prefer detach, so that an explicit detach() function is
> > not needed. It's easy enough to join() when appropriate.
> > But then I've yet to write an application that needed to
> > join.
> Our experiences differ. I very rarely have need for a detached
My limited experience with threads has always followed the pattern "spawn a
worker thread to perform lengthy operation X without blocking the main
thread, leaving it responsive." (Minor variations include "to perform
background operation Y", like keeping a buffer full of data.)
What is the usual 'join' model?
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk