From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-29 14:09:04
Darin Adler wrote:
> On Friday, June 29, 2001, at 11:29 AM, Greg Colvin wrote:
> > From: <jbandela_at_[hidden]>
> >> Wow, this is pretty neat.
> > Indeed it is.
> > One nit:
> > BOOST_PREPROCESSOR is a lot to type, mabye BOOST_CPP would do?
> Are the both talking about the same thing? Boost has both the preprocessor
> library, currently under formal review, and the template metaprogramming
> library, not yet ready for formal review. The subject of the message said
> "Template Metaprogramming" but then Greg mentioned
> BOOST_PREPROCESSOR, the prefix used in macros for the preprocessor
I think they are not :). However, it's easy to get confused here, in
particular because PREPROCESSOR library was first introduced to this list as
"C Pre Processor meta programming library".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk