Re: [boost] Re: boost subnamespaces proposal.

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 13:32:37

At 08:34 PM 6/29/2001, Jeremy Siek wrote:

 >Also, I don't like the idea of nesting the matrix stuff inside
 >boost::math::numeric. Three levels is a bit much. I'd much prefer linear
 >algebra stuff to just go in boost::numeric.

Do we really need both boost::math and boost::numeric?  Or 
boost::math::numeric?

This isn't an attempt at a taxonomy.  It is just trying to solve the 
software engineer problem of namespace pollution without incurring the 
added costs (confusion, uglyness, etc.) of too many namespaces.

Just my option, of course.

--Beman