From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 14:34:35
Once again, I want to encourage people to consider the Lib 225/229 issues
carefully when replying.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: boost subnamespaces proposal.
> At 08:34 PM 6/29/2001, Jeremy Siek wrote:
> >Also, I don't like the idea of nesting the matrix stuff inside
> >boost::math::numeric. Three levels is a bit much. I'd much prefer linear
> >algebra stuff to just go in boost::numeric.
> Do we really need both boost::math and boost::numeric? Or
> This isn't an attempt at a taxonomy. It is just trying to solve the
> software engineer problem of namespace pollution without incurring the
> added costs (confusion, uglyness, etc.) of too many namespaces.
> Just my option, of course.
> Info: http://www.boost.org Unsubscribe:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk