Re: [boost] Re: boost subnamespaces proposal.

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 14:34:35

Once again, I want to encourage people to consider the Lib 225/229 issues
carefully when replying.

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: boost subnamespaces proposal.

> At 08:34 PM 6/29/2001, Jeremy Siek wrote:
>
>  >Also, I don't like the idea of nesting the matrix stuff inside
>  >boost::math::numeric. Three levels is a bit much. I'd much prefer linear
>  >algebra stuff to just go in boost::numeric.
>
> Do we really need both boost::math and boost::numeric?  Or
> boost::math::numeric?
>
> This isn't an attempt at a taxonomy.  It is just trying to solve the
> software engineer problem of namespace pollution without incurring the
> added costs (confusion, uglyness, etc.) of too many namespaces.
>
> Just my option, of course.
>
> --Beman
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>