Re: [boost] big_int, was Re: New file uploaded to boost

From: John Max Skaller (skaller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-03 11:46:23

helmut.zeisel_at_[hidden] wrote:

> I did not yet implement shift operators.
> As you might have noticed,
> in my implementation the radix is a template parameter,

        WHY? I really don't understand. There's no use for templates
here. There's exactly one kind of desirable big_int, the fastest
possible one, which always uses the biggest available word size
as a radix. 

-- 
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller_at_[hidden] 
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
New generation programming language Felix  http://felix.sourceforge.net
Literate Programming tool Interscript     
http://Interscript.sourceforge.net