From: Samuel Krempp (krempp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-03 11:47:32
> Might be time for Sam to choose a final design candidate, write it up, and
> then get reactions from Boost programmers who have not been involved in the
I'm now settled for the design
except on one thing : passing manipulators. I like
operator* because it makes a short syntax, still showing what are args
and what are manipulators.
But I have some doubts that using a second operator will ever be
So I have a solution with 'glue' (if you have a better name I'll be happy)
which is longer to type, clutters the user code a bit with extra
parenthesis, but still is pretty simple and sound.
Anyway, this issue is exposed at the end of my Readme.txt
So is this the time when I shout "Formal Review Please !", or should I
first write more doc (and htmlize it), more samples, and provides
regression tests (the framework is quite complex, it must take some time
to get a hand on it..) ?
as of now, I renamed the headers to "format.hpp", (considering my
format is closer to inclusion than the previous boost::format in the
used the boost directory structure, and packed te directory in zip and
tar.gz and uploaded it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk