Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Build - #include <> vs. ""

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-13 17:29:38

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>

> As a personal preference, I like the look and feel of <...>
> denoting "system" headers, e.g. standard headers, POSIX
> headers, or third party libraries such as boost usually installed
> in a central location on the machine.  Opposed to this are
> "..." headers local to the current project.

FWIW, that "feels right" to me also.

-Dave