Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-15 19:58:51

At 06:29 PM 7/13/2001, David Abrahams wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
>> As a personal preference, I like the look and feel of <...>
>> denoting "system" headers, e.g. standard headers, POSIX
>> headers, or third party libraries such as boost usually installed
>> in a central location on the machine. Opposed to this are
>> "..." headers local to the current project.
>FWIW, that "feels right" to me also.

Me too. But I haven't been closely following this thread, and so may be
grasping for a too simple solution. Particularly one that means we don't
have to change a bunch of otherwise stable boost code.

If the consensus is that we should continue with <...> for the reasons
given above, I'd like to make sure that rationale gets added to the


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at