From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-15 19:58:51
At 06:29 PM 7/13/2001, David Abrahams wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
>> As a personal preference, I like the look and feel of <...>
>> denoting "system" headers, e.g. standard headers, POSIX
>> headers, or third party libraries such as boost usually installed
>> in a central location on the machine. Opposed to this are
>> "..." headers local to the current project.
>FWIW, that "feels right" to me also.
Me too. But I haven't been closely following this thread, and so may be
grasping for a too simple solution. Particularly one that means we don't
have to change a bunch of otherwise stable boost code.
If the consensus is that we should continue with <...> for the reasons
given above, I'd like to make sure that rationale gets added to the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk