From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-16 15:41:30
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Review: Boost Coding Guidelines
> I feel we should reject this since I don't feel it is appropriate for
> Boost to mandate some of the things in these guidelines. The
> implementation of a Boost library is really up to the discretion of
> the submitter; if they happen to prefer foo_ to m_foo, then who are
> we to argue?
> I realise that this is not the intention of the "guidelines", and
> they are merely supposed to be suggestions, but I don't think they
> will be seen that way.
There's something to be said for saying what you mean!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk