From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-20 10:51:04
From: "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]>
> From: Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> > From: "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]>
> > > How should we deal with the case of x,y being outside the image?
> > A function should not try to do too many things.
> > bool is_inside(int x, int y) const;
> > color_type get_pixel(int x, int y) const;
> My point is not about returning pixels from an image. It is just an
> I'm sure you can come out with an example that suits you. (A function that
> might not return a value in a situation were that is not an exception).
I didn't mean to imply that stateful<T> is not useful. I just think that
"case A" is not a good demonstration of its usefulness, that's all.
> Or simply take the case of set/map insert().
Actually this is a bit different. The associative insert() always returns a
valid iterator, regardless of whether the 'bool' part is true. You'll have
to decide whether your class is a discriminated union (you can't extract a
value from it when it's empty(), operator* leads to undefined behaviour) or
a (T, bool) pair.
> You may think that I am solving my problems the wrong way, just like you
> with respect to the image example,
No, not at all, sorry for giving the wrong impression.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk