From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-20 10:08:42
At 10:24 AM 7/18/2001, Ronald Garcia wrote:
> I am curious
>though about applying the same review process for libraries to
>documents. It's easier to accept a library before it is in its
>finished form than a document.
Normally we don't formally review documents, but it was obvious that "Boost
Coding Guidelines" might be contentious, and in any case would greatly
benefit from peer-review since any coding guideline which isn't widely
accepted won't be followed.
A formal review is really the only way we have to see if consensus exists.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk