Re: [boost] Review: Boost Coding Guidelines

From: Iain.Hanson_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-07-20 13:24:51

     Its embaressing. But I have no control over that disclaimer. Its 
     inserted by our firewall. It is not *my* sig.
     
     btw, I'm no lawyer, but as I addressed it to boost and if you are a 
     member of boost, then I believe that I addressed it to you. I would 
     also imagine that given that boost is a publicly accessable mailing 
     list, then the contents of my mail are in the public domain.
     
     /ikh

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [boost] Review: Boost Coding Guidelines
Author:  gcolvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden]) at unix,mime
Date:    20/07/01 18:40

By the way, since I am not the "named addressee" it would seem that 
this quoted reply is a violation of your confidentiality agreement. 
Is that your intention?  And what if I want to forward this message 
to a colleague for discussion?
     

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.