From: Joel Young (jdy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-27 09:46:20
"George A. Heintzelman" <georgeh_at_[hidden]>
said regarding socket++:
> If these two issues were to be fixed, I believe it would be a fine
> starting point for boost's socket/non-blocking IO libraries; it is
> non-intrusive, and the interface handles all of the bind/listen system
> call orderings transparently.
However the license for socket++ does not explicitly allow
modification of the source code. Also, the original author
appears to have disapeared off of the face of the earth.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk