Re: [boost] Syntactic sugar for regex

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-28 06:22:40

>As a non-user of perl, I would request the replace_all syntax to be
>developed/included.  It is easier for me to understand that than learn new
operator
>overloading.  I'm not saying that I'm opposed to the perl type, there is
some cool
>stuff going on there from what I saw.

The thing that worries me about lamba like code in general, is that it's
not at all obvious what's going on (to a casual browser of the code) where
as function names like "replace", or "find" are reasonably obvious.

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/