Date: 2001-08-07 10:57:20
--- In boost_at_y..., Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_a...> wrote:
> At 01:41 AM 8/7/2001, Gennadiy E. Rozental wrote:
> >I downloaded version of unit test framework based on one from
> > I made changes to original design (including some header files
> >refactoring and almost complete elimination of virtual functions)
> >added couple new features:
> > progress display (boost library based) - to use with long tests
> > parametrized test cases - if you want to run one test case with
> >different parameters ( I have test case specification in the
> >file and I have hundreds of such files).
> > Code still have lot of things to enchance (especially in
> > I've tried to keep original coding style.
> >Hope for comments,
> Oh dear. It looks like you based your refactoring on the older
> code in the files/vault rather than the newer code in CVS under the
> unit_test_development branch. We should have deleted the old code
> YahooGroups files/vault. I've done that now.
> We really need to get unit tests ready for review. The changes you
> suggesting are certainly worth discussing. Perhaps you could
> and I privately, and we can work out an action plan.
> This points out a real problem - we are doing a poor job of
> old files from the fault. At one point Dave suggested we just
> everything and start over. It may be time to do just that.
If you decide to do this, please give us a few days notice first.
I've got some code in the vault that I'm not 100% sure I've got
copies of anywhere else, and I suspect some other people may be in
the same boat (despite this being a foolish thing to do *chuckles*).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk