From: John Max Skaller (skaller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-10 19:32:58
Beman Dawes wrote:
> > Shared memory is expensive, local memory is cheap.
> >If threads can run with the stack on 'on board' memory which is on a
> >high speed per CPU bus from main memory, they might run considerably
> >faster: such memory can be cached without being flushed, since only
> >one CPU can access it.
> > Sounds like a question for embedded programming people.
> Yes. But for Boost.Threads, we want to stick closely to the thread
> execution model we think is already supported by virtually all current UNIX
> and Windows compilers. We aren't trying to break new ground here. So the
> memory rules for what functions in different threads can access have to
> stay as close as possible to the current rules for what separate functions
> in the same thread can access.
-- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller_at_[hidden] 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 New generation programming language Felix http://felix.sourceforge.net Literate Programming tool Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk