Re: [boost] Re: boost.threads jamfiles

From: Scott McCaskill (scott_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-10 17:51:37

Ahh.. ok, much better now.  Thanks!

----- Original Message -----
From: <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 5:32 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: boost.threads jamfiles

> --- In boost_at_y..., "Scott McCaskill" <scott_at_m...> wrote:
> > It appears that someone has removed the Jamfiles for the threads
> library
> > from the CVS repository.  This makes it difficult to build the
> library.
> > What's up with that?
>
> I'm working hard at a lot of things in Boost.Threads preparing it for
> the immenant submission.  The old Jamfiles have been replaced with
> new Jamfiles in different locations ;).  Things have been modified to
> follow the same general design as was used in Python, as I expect
> this to be a closer basis for what Boost may eventually standardize
> on for how to structure this stuff.  So, if you check out all of
> threads-initial you should now find that there's a
> boost/libs/thread/build directory with a Jamfile for the library.
> There's also a Jamfile under boost/libs/thread/test to build and run
> the unit-test.  The final Jamfile is in boost/libs/thread/example
> which builds all the example programs.  If you can't find them then
> please let me know since that likely means I screwed something up in
> CVS.
>
> BTW, the Jamfiles are currently known to work only with MSVC++, so if
> you're using another compiler/platform I'm not sure how they'll work
> for you.
>
> Bill Kempf
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>