|
Boost : |
From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-13 14:10:46
> Yep, one queue per thread. Just like the original example - one CV per
> thread - unless I misinterpreted it.
how about one mutex/CV *per queue* with multiple threads..
mutex m;
queue<int> q;
condition cv;
void threadfunc()
{
for(;;)
{
int m;
{
mutex::scoped_lock lock( m );
while(q.empty())
cv.wait( lock );
m = q.pop();
}
if(m & 1) do_something_a();
if(m & 2) do_something_b();
if(m & 4) do_something_c();
}
}
void notifyThread(bool a, bool b, bool c)
{
{
mutex::scoped_lock lock( m );
q.push(a + 2 * b + 4 * c);
}
cv.notify_one();
}
regards,
alexander.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk