From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-18 02:24:31
Mark Rodgers wrote:
> since "bind" allows us to create function objects in which
> nothing is actually bound, I perhaps "call" or "apply" would
> be more appropriate:
> boost::call( f, _1, _2 )( x, y );
> boost::apply( f, _1, _2 )( x, y );
So why name it "call" when it doesn't call anything, but just
creates a function object?
I'm fine with "bind".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk